“Yet, given the divisions among us, deeper and wider than ever,
it is an open question as to how, and how long, we will endure as one people.”
– Patrick Buchanan
America has indelicately allowed every tribe of man to roar onto her shores. The “powers that be” have shown no regard or caution for the cultures/religions of America’s immigrants. Within our borders reside a wide variety of Japethites, Hammites, and Shemmites. It is as if some mad scientist decided to see what would happen by mixing together the most volatile chemicals.
When the Statue of Liberty calls out, “Give me your tired, your poor, your huddled masses, yearning to breathe free,” poor huddled masses is precisely what we have gotten ever since. Shiploads of human freight, yearning to be free…free to impose their foreign cultures–such as Sharia Law–onto a new wide-open and pliable territory.
Speaking of foreign-imposed cultures, perhaps it bears repeating that not only was Emma Lazarus, author of that Statue of Liberty poem, “The Colossus,” from a Jewish background, but so was Israel Zargwill, author of the famous 1908 play, The Melting Pot, not to mention the fact that the early founders and agitators for the NAACP were also Jewish socialists. One would think that the Jews would have been pleased enough with the Judaized Puritans who were already here.
Yet, being the nomadic and anti-nationalist people that they are, Jews continue to harbor an aversion to “soil” nationalism (at least, for whites), and they continue to argue, as Steve Cohen does, that immigration controls are “inherently racist in that they are based on the crudest of all nationalisms–namely the assertion that the British have a franchise on Britain.”
But I digress.
Returning to the idea of an American Melting Pot, it is said that immigrants are the spice of a stew. But taking that image further, if America is a melting pot, then we have a stew made up less of broth and more of a disproportionate amount of spices. Such a stew makes one sick. There is no culture. There is no religion. There is no race. There is only a cacophany of madness.
However, the earliest attempts by the Church to gain a major foothold in North America–the early missions of Spain and France, as well as the Catholic Englishmen who founded Maryland–were early on demolished with Puritan fire, so that at this point, the Catholics of America are like a people in the wilderness.
And so now, we have a horrifying version of the City of Babel, where people are no longer speaking the same language, literally and culturally. The very idea of ethnic diversity and the experiment of the Melting Pot has become an idol. Vast swathes of the people are kept divided from one another through race-preference propaganda and the overall indoctrination of the pop culture, and they are ready to tear at each other’s throats.
How will an American Catholic Monarch handle this? The people I am describing are not the pliable, agreeable citizenry that I fantasized about in the last post. This is a nation divided and ready to fall into civil war.
The Tribes of America Want Something Currently Unspeakable
When you have a diverse population in close proximity with each other, and you have nothing to unify any of them at all, there will be strife and crime. Murders, robberies, and rapes will be the order of the day. The rich and successful people will abandon the area, leaving the poorer and unsuccessful people to slug it out in a “neighborhood war” lasting for decades.
Consider the Chinatowns, the Korea Towns, and the Filipino Enclaves. Think about the heavily Somalian community that is about to take over Minneapolis. Is it permissible to mention the German Amish community of Pennsylvania, or even the various scattered Indian Reservations?
Call to mind the never-ending drumbeat in the black community to celebrate black cities, black entertainment, and black news media. Recall how there is a Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard in most cities. Recall “the look of the permanently aggrieved” that seems stamped upon their faces. Remember how Mayor Ray Nagin once said in 2006 after Hurricane Katrina passed:
“We as black people, it’s time, it’s time for us to come together. It’s time for us to rebuild a New Orleans, the one that should be a chocolate New Orleans. And I don’t care what people are saying Uptown or wherever they are. This city will be chocolate at the end of the day.”
Think about the radical Leftist students at the University of Michigan who are currently demanding a no-white space, from which they can further plot social justice activism against whites. Think of all of the safe spaces from whites that are being called for on campuses across the entire nation.
And now, consider Hispanics and their present-day systematic purging of blacks in California neighborhoods. Reflect on the Aztlan Movement, which seeks to claim a legal and primordial right to the lands of the Southwest United States. And let’s not forget the myriad of business districts that refuse to feature English–but only Spanish language on their storefronts.
Need I state the desire among whites to have their own domain? Though the white American will not openly admit to it, the very phenomenon of White Flight attests to the fact that whites seek to leave their former cities–most of which are overtaken by diversity–for more controlled and recognizable surroundings. They will even flee to the rural countryside to attain such peace.
According to professor Kevin B. MacDonald, American whites are coalescing into implicit white communities that reflect white identity without dare bringing attention to themselves:
“Research on ethnocentrism has shown that people often have unconscious attitudes that they do not express explicitly. Unconsciously, the vast majority of Whites have the usual stereotypes about Blacks, but they would never say so explicitly, at least partly for fear of the consequences. Parents’ choice of schools and neighborhoods (their “revealed preferences”) reflect this widespread racial hypocrisy. Parents, including liberal parents, act on their implicit attitudes, and there is a profound gap between their implicit attitudes and behavior (where they show in-group racial preference) and their explicit attitudes (where they piously express the official ideology of egalitarianism).
“In effect, they are creating implicit White communities. They do not explicitly state that their choice of friends, neighborhoods, and schools derives from racial preference, because that conflicts with their explicit racial attitudes and with official ideology. And when explaining why they vote Republican, they talk about “limited government,” opposition to the welfare state, and lower taxes. In turn, Republican candidates often appeal to them in exactly these terms.”
Evidence is sown throughout America. People want their own tribe. In quite a few instances, one tribe demands dominance over another tribe. Some Americans can get along with other ethnicities, but most do not handle it well.
Working and purchasing goods in the same proximity of different people of a different race are one thing–but this does not mean you will be able to happily live next to them. Most cannot handle that, and most choose not to deal with that if they can help it.
It’s the brutal truth.
Segregation Would Be Allowed Under These Circumstances
Blame lies squarely on the Left, who has forced multiculturalism onto American society. Such globalists think themselves gods. But in reality, they’ve left one of the worst civilizational messes one can leave.
And so, someone has to clean up the progressives’ mess.
A compassionate king would, therefore, allow for soft segregation, due to the current emergency circumstances. Segregation of some kind would be allowed–if not outright enforced–and it would be on a temporary basis spanning at least a generation (if not longer) through his line of heirs.
This segregation would not be based on the superiority of one ethnicity over another, as it was in America’s Puritan past. A Catholic Monarch would consider all of the Americans to be equal under the crown. No, this type of segregation would be out of urgent necessity. And though there would be segregation in the very beginning, the king and his heirs would work to unite America in as much of a universal fashion as is possible with the circumstances.
So, programs to bus in different ethnic minorities to a particular locale would be ended. Flying refugees into a particular neighborhood or city would halt. The agitation of communities would end. Doing this would halt the phenomenon of White Flight, and this kind of an action is something that most Americans want.
In fact, it may be that America would have to be restructured somehow in order to conform to this new paradigm. What would that resemble? What model would best demonstrate such a spread of people? That is not the topic for this essay. Although, one idea that comes to my mind is a series of separated enclaves surrounding a central city that caters to all of the ethnicities.
It may be that Americans of our current generation decry this kind of an idea. But the next generation and the one after that may welcome this idea. And furthermore, this hypothetical Catholic monarch’s decree for segregation would be validated by God’s Own actions. Although God transcends race, and even though God prefers that we transcend our ethnic differences, He nevertheless knew from the beginning that we could not, at first, handle being in such close proximity to one another.
I have stated before that God was the progenitor of ethnonationalism. He divided the nations and determined boundaries for them, and He assigned guardian angels over their different nations. The Lord did this for our own good, as He did not want the world to experience the chaotic civil strife that threatens to tear America apart today.
“The children had to be separated,” as a parent would say. Segregation is not a good unto itself, and there are people who are capable of transcending racial barriers. In fact, looking at different people with a universal attitude is a very Catholic phenomenon, and most Catholics ought to be able to transcend their own tribe to one degree or another.
However, the Miracle of Pentecost took place among believers in the Church. This is important to know, because most of America is not in the Church, nor would an American King be dealing with only Catholics. It would be folly for the Catholic King of America to believe this nation, with its racist past, would be able to experience an immediate, rapid repentance and conversion from its previous puritanical bigotry, and to further expect Americans to regard other people with Catholic minds. This will not happen.
God segregated mankind for his benefit, and men have segregated themselves for the same reasons. Whether it was the separation of men at Babel, the exile of Cain, the isolation of the Hammites, the preservation of the Hebrews, the tribalism of the Persian King Jamshid, or even the reclusiveness of the Japanese, the “children have been separated” for their own good.
America, having become a microcosm of the world, shall have to re-learn ancient lessons that were taught with acts of God. A Catholic King will recognize this, and he will tread carefully with this most crucial issue of our land, if we are to remain as a whole nation.
The End of Subversive Racial Organizations
The state-sponsored Catholic religion would be the binding force that would formally (and later, organically) hold Americans together. At its core, Catholicism is universal. And in the long term, within the span of untold generations, Catholic American universalism among the Americans would be realized. Defiance of that end, whether in openly hostile organizations, college rallies, or secret Freemasonic-styled clubs, would be punished.Any organization that preached a takeover would be suppressed. Any kind of caucus or party that openly or even secretly discussed the spread and subversion of Catholic America would be infiltrated, exposed, and destroyed.
There would no longer be a national Black History Month. Martin Luther King Jr. Day would not be a compulsory celebration. Otherwise, if these traditions are to remain, then there must be a Hispanic History Month, an Asian History Month, a Jewish History Month–and certainly, a White History Month. Such traditions would either include everyone, or there would be no such traditions.
There would be no toleration for the promotion of “home countries” such as Mexico. Law and order would be dispensed, should there be a massive parade or protest march of “Americans” waving the Mexican flag. This is America, and we either have a country, or we don’t. New lines must be drawn.
There would also be no tolerance for DiversityKult. While diversity and interracial mixing can be a fine thing if done for the right reasons, this current, hyper-actively pushed, Babel-styled, globalist, race for a Utopian nation of mixed people would end. Advertisers would be encouraged to speak to the actual target audiences, rather than some kind of utopian family unit that is not the mainstream.
There is currently a disproportionate representation of mixed families in American media, and it has become obvious that this is a part of a push towards a one-world ethnicity. Certain parties in our society have pushed for a “browning” of America for one reason or another, and in doing so, they make a god out of race. Under an American Catholic king, this idolatry would end, as it demeans the majority of families and couples who choose not to engage in interracial families.
It is easy to suggest that people of mixed ethnic backgrounds would be celebrated. It feels emotionally satisfying to say that such mixed Americans would be regarded as the fruits of American universality. We say to ourselves: “The day will come when people will see mixed Americans, and they’ll smile and say, ‘Only in America!'” It is nice to think of a national holiday for such people. After all, under such measures, mixed Americans would be able to identify with one another, no longer feeling like displaced children who try to figure out which of their parents’ cultures they should identify with.
Yet, even revering mixed Americans is making an idol out of race. At first, this American phenomenon would be welcomed happily. And, after all, celebrating mixed Americans would seem to remove a tooth from the various race factions calling for dominance. However, given the fullness of time, in the span of many generations, there would be a new conflict of “New Americans” vs the “Old Americans,” and a similar but even more complex race issue would be burning a hole in the middle of the nation.
“Whoever exalts race, or the people, or the State, or a particular form of State, or the depositories of power, or any other fundamental value of the human community – however necessary and honorable be their function in worldly things – whoever raises these notions above their standard value and divinizes them to an idolatrous level, distorts and perverts an order of the world planned and created by God; he is far from the true faith in God and from the concept of life which that faith upholds.”
-Pope Pius XI
A Catholic king would stop forcing the idea that all men are built equally, when they are not. He would have us acknowledge our differences.
Not everyone can catch sickle cell disease. Not everyone can tolerate milk, nor eat garbanzo beans. Not everyone shares the same tolerance for iodine. Even our very brains are different. This is an objective fact. God has allowed the tribes of men to segment in different ways from one another. We are not the same.
A Catholic Monarch would recognize that each ethnic group has much to offer the nation, and that the Catechism teaches that “benefits are derived from social commerce,” that talents “are not distributed equally,” and that differences between men oblige them to practice generosity and kindness, with a mutual enrichment of one another.
And, while the king would have us objectively acknowledge our differences, he would also encourage us to take advantage of our similarities.
This king and his heirs would encourage the different tribes of America to conquer their weaknesses and engage other countrymen in generosity and good will. He would encourage this, all the while allowing their communities to retain their identities if they must. As it was with the fallout from the Tower of Babel, North American people would be allowed to retreat for a time, lick their wounds, recover, and start fresh.
# # #
Now, everything in this article having been said, the chances of its implementation are slim to nothing. The ethnic and ideological civil war that threatens to tear the American nation apart is vivid and apparent to most Americans today. As of this writing, a great darkness looms in the near future, and people will acknowledge this if you ask them about it, and they trust you enough to talk about it.
This impending civil war scenario is largely due to various self-interested Leftist parties that have stoked the fires of division for the last century. Nothing was done to stop it, and so long as America refuses to convert its heart to Jesus Christ, nothing will be done to stop the calamity that waits to take us all. That calamity has no shape as of yet, but whatever form it takes, be assured that dark forces are working at this very moment to make it a reality.
The world will never enjoy unity apart from Christ. The same can be said of America. Without a religion–the True Religion–to unite us, we will continue to edge toward the cliff until we all fall off of it as a people.